Which of the following is NOT a reason to remove body armor?

The reasoning behind why "increase comfort" is not a valid reason to remove body armor lies in the primary purpose and considerations involved in body armor use in tactical scenarios. Body armor is specifically designed to provide protection against ballistic threats and other potential injuries in high-stress environments. Removing it solely for the sake of comfort does not align with the critical need to maintain safety and security during tactical operations.

In contrast, the other options present legitimate clinical reasons. Assessing for injuries is crucial, as medical personnel must ensure that any trauma is adequately evaluated and treated. Performing treatments may also necessitate the removal of body armor, particularly if there is a need to access certain areas of the body. Relieving respiratory distress can be an urgent medical concern and may require the removal of restrictive clothing, including body armor, to facilitate breathing.

The focus in tactical medicine must always prioritize the safety of both the patient and the medical providers, and comfort, while important in some contexts, is secondary to the primary goals of assessment and treatment in the field.