What principle emphasizes the need for an unexpected attack in close-quarter battle (CQB)?

The principle that emphasizes the need for an unexpected attack in close-quarter battle (CQB) is surprise. In the context of CQB, surprise can significantly alter the dynamics of an encounter, allowing an operator to gain the upper hand over an adversary. Achieving surprise disrupts the opponent’s situational awareness and response time, which is critical in the fast-paced and often chaotic environment of close-quarters engagements.

When operators employ tactics that capitalize on surprise, they can catch their adversaries off guard, leading to a tactical advantage that may increase the likelihood of success while minimizing risk to themselves and their team. In tactical operations, this principle is often viewed as a force multiplier, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the team and improving the chances of achieving mission objectives with greater safety.

The other principles, while important in their own contexts, such as speed, physical dominance, and violence of action, do not inherently focus on the element of unexpectedness that defines surprise. Speed focuses on the quickness of movement and execution, physical dominance pertains to strength and control over an adversary, and violence of action refers to the intense and aggressive application of force. While these principles can complement surprise in tactical settings, they do not specifically highlight the importance of catching the